|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
426
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 04:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:ccp don't nerf my titan, we RMT'd a lot of money on them
the tales of ~elite pvp~ A member of cascade imminent talking about elite pee vee pee. Now I've seen it all.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
426
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 04:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:ccp don't nerf my titan, we RMT'd a lot of money on them
the tales of ~elite pvp~ A member of cascade imminent talking about elite pee vee pee. Now I've seen it all. That burn would have worked if I had claimed I was "elite pvp", but I didn't so you look pretty dumb right now Perhaps I could write some sort of guide to writing burns on the evelopedia and you could then peruse it What is this i don't even.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
429
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 14:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
Hmm, just out of interest how come everyone is assuming it was related to buying ISK? I would have thought PL would be more likely to be involved in selling it?
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
429
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 15:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:CCP Sreegs you need to show a similar Goonswarm RMT sweep before people start thinking you are pulling a T20.
The evil EvE playerbase will obviously suspect that as former GS leader you would rush in help of GS now that they are in difficulty due to the Fanfest incident and PL could take advantage.
Creaming the GS enemies right after Mittani's ban without a similar mirror operation on GS WILL be seen as Developer involvement in game. Unless, you know, goons aren't involved in RMT to such a massive degree. I'm sure some of them do it, and have done it in the past, but the same could be said of any alliance.
Some other alliances seem to have made actual agreements with ISK merchants, in terms of letting them bot in their space and in selling/buying their own ISK. If evidence can be found that goons have done this, fine, but you cannot run a "Goonswarm RMT sweep" unless goons have actually been RMTing.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
431
|
Posted - 2012.04.02 04:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
Rory Orlenard wrote:The thread has turned into accusing Goonswarm of botting. How many of you put a cloak on a rookie ship and went to Goon space to check ?
I friggin did . Did you ? I could not care more then the width of a hair on a raccoons arse about goons but i hunt bots - i found active players who responded by hunting me. I didn't find bots.
You better have some talk that includes words showing you know how to hunt bots before i take a word of your drivel serious.
I care nothing for 0.0 alliances - they are all jerks who can't tell an honest application when they see one and instead accept spies cause the spies know what to say but I found no bots in goon space. Hehe, I actually ratted my sec status back up in goon space. One of them even challenged me to a 1v1 in a drake, versus my shield cane. He was good to his word, no blobbing or help from other goons. The fight ended with him killing my ECM drones, getting me down to low shield but he couldn't stay in range to hold point on me. Thing is though, I was willing to die, he actually stopped firing and let me go back to ratting 
Anyway, moral of story, personally I think the goons are unnecessarily vilified. After bowling about in their space for a few days, just jumping system to system killing a BS rat, I found that even those in the fleets that formed to kill me were pretty nice guys.
And they certainly didn't PvP like a bunch of botters either 
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
440
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 01:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:No, it's MONEY. The only way to get that much gate camping and blobbing going to be as reliable as we see it in this game, is for there to be a monetary motivation for it. Think about how long it takes for a few people to do an open source software project that goes anywhere versus how rapidly and advanced a DARPA-funded project goes. Would you work on software 18 hours a day for free? Nope. For a big haul of cash? Most people would.
That botting, and hence RMT, means a LOT of money, the motivation to shut nullsec out is coming from money. And those who still want to go have to either join the big alliances that bot and RMT, OR become a renter from such entities and pay them more ISK.
I would not be surprised if Hilmar found a horse's head in his bed considering how much money is involved and the kind of RL crime organizations who are already adept at laundering money gotten from "other than normal" means. I hope CCP employees are well armed and trained. (Any who are not I will train for free, btw). Posting to confirm that null sec alliances are actually all run by the mob, and that I am paid to gate camp the entrances to such systems in ounces of charlie.
(also apparently the non-slang word for chang is censored, seriously CCP?)
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
441
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 11:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
Terrorfrodo wrote:Ok then. I know sov does not generate ISK (quite the opposite), but I thought that someone who does not hold sov is unlikely to hold a lot of the most valuable moons (for long). There's no real link between holding sov and holding moons, and power projection/reinforce timers in Eve allow people with enough capitals to hold moons in systems without regard to where they are deployed.
For example if you attacked a PL tech moon in Aridia they would very shortly log on an alt to check on it, if you reinforced it then when it comes out of reinforced they'd have a capital fleet jumped in to defend it and rep it back up. Failing that they'd just bridge in a sub-cap fleet with a load of logistics.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
444
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 20:11:00 -
[8] - Quote
Blastcaps Madullier wrote:Aranakas wrote:>1 or 2 false positives
Sounds like it's just a system that doesn't allow appeals. Think there needs to be a appeal system in place besides pertition, sooner or later one of those false positives unable to appeal it via pertitions etc WILL turn round and slap CCP with a lawsuit for liable, defamation of character etc for it, not having a independant appeal system will come back to bite ccp in the heiny. The fact you can spell neither libel or petition speaks volumes as to your legal expertise.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |
|
|
|